Steen Custom Vision Contact Us Toll Free at 1-800-326-9938
The Most Advanced Technology
Home Meet Dr. Steen About Us Advanced Technology FAQ Testimonials Are You a Candidate for Laser Surgery? Contact Us
Laser Vision Correction, Is it for you? Click here! Patient Financing, $0 down, 0% interest, click here for offer! Patient Success Stories, Click here!
Steen-Hall Eye Institute, Shreveport, LA
Femtosecond Laser versus Mechanical Microkeratome for LASIK: A Randomized Controlled Study  

Presented at: Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology Annual Meeting, May 2006, Fort Lauderdale, Florida.
Sanjay V. Patel, Leo J. Maguire, Jay W. McLaren, David O. Hodge, William M. Bourne

Purpose
To compare corneal haze (backscattered light) and visual outcomes between fellow eyes randomized to LASIK with the flap created by a femtosecond laser (bladeless) or with the flap created by a mechanical microkeratome.

Design
Randomized, controlled, paired-eye study.


Participants
Twenty-one patients (42 eyes) received LASIK for myopia or myopic astigmatism.


Methods
One eye of each patient was randomized to flap creation with a femtosecond laser (IntraLase FS, IntraLase Corp., Irvine, CA) with intended thickness of 120 µm, and the fellow eye to flap creation with a mechanical microkeratome (Hansatome, Bausch & Lomb, Rochester, NY) with intended thickness of 180 µm. Patients were examined before and at 1, 3, and 6 months after LASIK.


Main Outcome Measures
Corneal backscatter, high-contrast visual acuity, manifest refractive error, contrast sensitivity, and intraocular forward light scatter were measured at each examination. Flap thickness was measured by confocal microscopy at 1 month, and patients were asked if they preferred the vision in either eye at 3 months.


Results
Corneal backscatter was 6% higher after bladeless LASIK than after LASIK with the mechanical microkeratome at 1 month (P = 0.007), but not at 3 or 6 months. High-contrast visual acuity, contrast sensitivity, and forward light scatter did not differ between treatments at any examination. Flap thicknesses at 1 month were 143±16 µm (bladeless, mean ± standard deviation) and 138±22 µm (mechanical microkeratome), with no statistical difference in variances. At 3 months, 5 patients preferred the bladeless eye, 7 patients preferred the microkeratome eye, and 9 patients had no preference.


Conclusions
The method of flap creation did not affect visual outcomes during the first 6 months after LASIK. Although corneal backscatter was greater early after bladeless LASIK than LASIK with the mechanical microkeratome, patients did not perceive a difference in vision.

   
 
   ©2004 Steen Custom Vision  Privacy Policy
   Home       Meet Dr. Steen       About Us       Advanced Technology       FAQ       Testimonials       Are you a Candidate?       Contact Us